http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,455027375,00.html
Friday, January 24, 2003
Risk of mental woes climbs for kids of
single parents
By Emma Ross
AP medical writer
LONDON ‹ Children growing up in single-parent
families are twice as likely as their counterparts to
develop serious psychiatric illnesses and addictions
later in life, according to an important new study.
[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
growing up in single-parent families
children are twice as likely as their counterparts be
said by psychiatry to have a psychiatric "disorder"/
"disease"/ "chemical imbalance"]
Researchers have for years debated whether children
from broken homes bounce back or whether they are
more likely than kids whose parents stay together to
develop serious emotional problems. [Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
saying "serious emotional problem" they mean psychiatric
"disorder"/ "disease"/ "chemical imbalance]
Experts say the latest study, published this week
in The Lancet medical journal, is important mainly
because of its unprecedented scale and follow-up ‹ it
tracked about 1 million children for a decade, into
their mid-20s.
The question of why and how those children end
up with such problems remains unanswered. The
study from Sweden's National Board for Health and
Welfare in Stockholm suggests that financial
hardship may play a role, but other experts say the
research also supports the view that quality of
parenting could be a factor.
The study used the Swedish national registries,
which cover almost the entire population and contain
extensive socio-economic and health information.
Children were considered to be living in a single-
parent household if they were living with the same
single adult in both the 1985 and 1990 housing
census. That could have been the result of divorce,
separation, death of a parent, out of wedlock birth,
guardianship or other reasons.
About 60,000 were living with their mother and
about 5,500 with their father. There were 921,257
living with both parents. The children were aged
between 6 and 18 at the start of the study, with half
already in their teens.
The scientists found that children with single
parents were twice as likely as the others to develop a
psychiatric illness such as severe depression or
schizophrenia, to kill themselves or attempt suicide
and to develop an alcohol-related disease.
[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
This research appears to suggest that
life/living/environment provides ample explanation
for severe depression,schizophrenia, attempted
suicide, suicide and and alcohol-related disease. But
in every case they--psychiatry appends the "illness"/
"disorder"/ "disease"/ "chemical imbalance" label,
not because they can find it on examination or test,
because they never can, but, because
they are financially obligated to rx. a "chemical
balancer" a pill, therefore, they must, if even
they have to invent it, come up with a "chemical
imbalance," "disease."]
Girls were three times more likely to become drug
addicts if they lived with a sole parent, and boys were
four times more likely. [Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
SUD: substance use
disorder. Even this, addiction they call a disease. It
is a disease, no doubt when one has taken substances
of addiction and gotten oneself addicted, no doubt,
but not before as all at the NIMH and NIDA
postulate, to give Big Pharma it's obligatory
target.]
The researchers concluded that financial hardship,
which they defined as renting rather than owning a
home and as being on welfare, made a big difference.
However, other experts questioned the financial
influence, saying Swedish single mothers are not poor
when compared with those in other countries and
suggested that quality of parenting could be a factor.
"It makes you think that what you're seeing is just
the most dysfunctional families having these
problems, rather than the low income. The money is
really an indicator of something else," said Sara
McLanahan, a professor of sociology at Princeton
University, who was not involved in the study.
"If you really thought that it was the income that
makes the difference, you would think that Swedish
lone mothers would do a lot better than the British or
those in the U.S., but they look very similar," she said.
Other experts agreed.
In the last 20 to 30 years, poverty has been greatly
reduced everywhere in Europe, but psychiatric
problems in children have not, said Dr. Stephen
Scott, a child health and behavior researcher at the
Institute of Psychiatry in London, who also was not
involved in the study. [Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
No wonder, the rate at
which the psychiatry-Big Pharma-federal & world
government cartel invents mental "diseases." Their
"epidemics" are as much a joke as their "diseases."
The money/dollars/millions/billions that bind them
together must be appreciated. ]
He said that in previous studies, once researchers
have adjusted their results to eliminate the influence
of bad parenting, any increased risk of emotional
problems shrinks markedly. This, he said, indicates it
is not so much single parenthood but the quality of
parenting that is at issue.[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
amazing, no mention
thus far of defective genes or chemical imbalances.
Bring in the bio-psychiatric clowns.]
"The
kind of people who end up as single parents might
not have done well by their kids, even if they hadn't
ended up alone. They tend to be more critical in their
relationships, more derogatory toward other people,"
Scott said, adding that it is also harder to be a warm,
non-critical parent when you're bringing up a child
alone.
However, he noted that there are plenty of
children from single-parent families who don't end
up with serious emotional problems.
There may also be a genetic element: More
irritable people are more likely to become separated,
but they are also more likely, whether they are
separated or not, to have more irritable children,
Scott said. [Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
I knew they were not far behind:
"There may also be a genetic element." ]
"The whole field is highly debated. This is another
piece in that debate that makes several important
points ‹ firstly that there really is an increased risk in
young adulthood of pretty bad things. It also
indicates it's not all about the money, but may be
about the people themselves," McLanahan
said.[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
"may be about the people themselves."
This is remarkably refreshing. Back to nurture. How
did these nurture folks within mental health ever get
out of the asylum, or off their depot
Prolixin? ]
-----------------------------------------
On the Net:
The Lancet, www.thelancet.com
|